Notably, IOR is set by the Fed’s Board of Governors and not by the FOMC. This distinction has been flagged inthe past by legal eagles worried about the seemingly remote prospect that—while the Board always without question has always adjusted IOR to reflect what the FOMC does with the fed-funds rate (which the FOMC controls)—a majority of the 7-person board might one day disagree with the decision of the 12-member FOMC and use this governance loophole to undercut an FOMC decision.
Again, this hasn’t ever been an issue because governors’ dissents have been very infrequent. Since Congress gave the Fed the ability to pay IOR in 2008, no governor had dissented at an FOMC meeting until last year. In July, when governors Chris Waller and Miki Bowman dissented to cut rates, the vote to maintain IOR at the end of the meeting was unanimous.
This is like so many other things … people are searching for reasons that would explain Trump’s zeal to fire Lisa Cook, and what he would do with four Fed Governors. So, just as the idea that they could not reappoint certain Bank Presidents, Timiroas’ tweet above is another deep reading of the complicated Fed rules to find another hidden objective for wanting to fire Cook.
Remember, Trump has not said what he would do with four Governor Seats. So we are all guessing.
To be clear, the FOMC has 12 voters: the 7 governors, the NY Fed President, and 4 rotating bank presidents (from the other 11 districts).
The 7 Governors eliminate the district bank President, and a majority rules (4 of the 7).